Bus 290 ( Business Ethics )

Whistle-Blowing Policies : Do the Benefits Outweigh the RisksDespite the opportunity for abuse that clearly presents itself in the Whistle-Blowing Policies adopted by some(prenominal) companies , it seems that , from a business wrench , the benefits clearly outweigh the risks . In the example given from Rockland internationalistic , it is clear that the employee in question , contrivance was using the interlocking s sing-blowing form _or_ system of government knowingly and to his aver advantage . Clearly he had a long-term plan which he was keeping in his back pocket until the time he might don it .Well , that time came for him and he fin tout ensembley came forward with the information he had been crowd for over a year , which enabled Rockland International to call a problem untold larger than an employee with an a genda , which was be them a great deal of m aney and which they were seemingly unplanned ofCertainly maneuver should not be credited for his honesty and forward-thinking , because it is denudate certain that he was using this information solely as an insurance policy for himself , but the fact of the matter is that the daub he brought to light needed to be brought to light , and is lots more significant than Art s need to cover his buttocks joint . In the article it also tell that the comp whatsoever had a policy regarding their whistle-blowing policy which stated that no employee bring home the bacon play adverse personnel action because of their actions and that efforts allow for be make by the lodge to protect the employee against backlash from coworkers . basically , one cannot be fired for blowing the whistle . This is why Art panorama this a fail-safe insurance policy even , this arrangement of the comp either s that the employee take over cannot be all over for other reasons .

In fact , in the example of Art , this illustrates more than anything that gathering up a case against some other person will not save your own business line , illustrating clearly that that is not the intention of the whistle-blowing policy (The downside of this being that some people with pertinent information won t choose to come down forward with it unless on that point is something in it for them ) For the company , it s a win-win bit . They can expend their own employees to smoke out those who be abusing company privileges , enchantment at the same time be not induce to keep anyone on board who blew the whist le but who is still an under-performing employee . The company , in to cover their own behinds , just needfully to be sure to document exhaustively all complaints against said employee , as well as all discussions with the employee regarding his /her performance and any disciplinary action taken or flagellumened . tho , this is typically the case in any employment-termination fact , because nowadays there is such a constant plethoric threat of lawsuits over wrongful termination and discrimination that any company would have to abide by this careful interest of surgery in to take any actionOf course there will be people who attempt to abuse the whistle-blowing policy and use...If you fate to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay